Continuing with our discussion about Ms. O’Donnell, we are going to further examine Ms. O’Donnell’s stances on various topics.
Ms. O’Donnell is an advocate of teaching creationism in our schools. For anyone who wants to talk about liberty and the public, you never mix religion with the public or government (that is a theocracy for those keeping track of definitions). Ms. O’Donnell correctly highlights that theory of evolution is a theory (after all, that is what is called now). Scientific theories have their appropriate place in the classroom as they follow a rigorous scientific method of examining empirical data. However, she wants to have creationism as part of the curriculum in public schools.
How about abortion for the ladies out there? She opposes abortion even in severe cases like rape and incest (there are a few other prominent politicians and party-backed individuals with this nonsensical behavior). Ladies, you and old who value freedom, take note of someone within your fellow sex and their beliefs. I’d have some concern if I were any of you who value the free ability to make your own choices (and live with that choice).
Now I understand that she has made statements only recently regarding if she is elected, “it’ll be the Constitution on which I base all of my decisions, not my personal beliefs.” That goes without saying, there are more links and articles to validate her statements (which she only made recently mind you). We’re talking about Ms. O’Donnell’s stances only, nothing more (I am concerned less about what the rest of the article says, I am merely using it a reference to her statement and it will only be treated as such).
My quick analysis of Ms. O’Donnell over the two posts relating to her are not meant to be an attack, negative. They are meant to be commentary, but also meant to be informative. I strongly feel that with any person running for office, regardless of what state, county or federal office they are running for, the proper stance for “We The People” is to truly understand and know with whom we are dealing with. Honestly, with some of her ideals and stances, as a “Classic Liberal” I see someone who is more than willing to violate the freedoms of all. That is someone who can not have my backing (as with most, if not all politicians today).
– “Classic Liberal”
Truth Not Fear 